On the effect of vitamin C intake on human health: How to (mis)interprete the clinical evidence
Research output: Contribution to journal › Review › Research › peer-review
Standard
On the effect of vitamin C intake on human health : How to (mis)interprete the clinical evidence. / Lykkesfeldt, Jens.
In: Redox Biology, Vol. 34, 101532, 2020.Research output: Contribution to journal › Review › Research › peer-review
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Author
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - On the effect of vitamin C intake on human health
T2 - How to (mis)interprete the clinical evidence
AU - Lykkesfeldt, Jens
N1 - Copyright © 2020 The Author. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
PY - 2020
Y1 - 2020
N2 - For decades, the potential beneficial effect of vitamin C on human health-beyond that of preventing scurvy-has been subject of much controversy. Hundreds of articles have appeared either in support of increased vitamin C intake through diet or supplements or rejecting the hypothesis that increased intake of vitamin C or supplementation may influence morbidity and mortality. The chemistry and pharmacology of vitamin C is complex and has unfortunately rarely been taken into account when designing clinical studies testing its effect on human health. However, ignoring its chemical lability, dose-dependent absorption and elimination kinetics, distribution via active transport, or complex dose-concentration-response relationships inevitably leads to poor study designs, inadequate inclusion and exclusion criteria and misinterpretation of results. The present review outlines the differences in vitamin C pharmacokinetics compared to normal low molecular weight drugs, focusses on potential pitfalls in study design and data interpretation, and re-examines major clinical studies of vitamin C in light of these.
AB - For decades, the potential beneficial effect of vitamin C on human health-beyond that of preventing scurvy-has been subject of much controversy. Hundreds of articles have appeared either in support of increased vitamin C intake through diet or supplements or rejecting the hypothesis that increased intake of vitamin C or supplementation may influence morbidity and mortality. The chemistry and pharmacology of vitamin C is complex and has unfortunately rarely been taken into account when designing clinical studies testing its effect on human health. However, ignoring its chemical lability, dose-dependent absorption and elimination kinetics, distribution via active transport, or complex dose-concentration-response relationships inevitably leads to poor study designs, inadequate inclusion and exclusion criteria and misinterpretation of results. The present review outlines the differences in vitamin C pharmacokinetics compared to normal low molecular weight drugs, focusses on potential pitfalls in study design and data interpretation, and re-examines major clinical studies of vitamin C in light of these.
U2 - 10.1016/j.redox.2020.101532
DO - 10.1016/j.redox.2020.101532
M3 - Review
C2 - 32535545
VL - 34
JO - Redox Biology
JF - Redox Biology
SN - 2213-2317
M1 - 101532
ER -
ID: 248555797