On the effect of vitamin C intake on human health: How to (mis)interprete the clinical evidence

Research output: Contribution to journalReviewResearchpeer-review

Standard

On the effect of vitamin C intake on human health : How to (mis)interprete the clinical evidence. / Lykkesfeldt, Jens.

In: Redox Biology, Vol. 34, 101532, 2020.

Research output: Contribution to journalReviewResearchpeer-review

Harvard

Lykkesfeldt, J 2020, 'On the effect of vitamin C intake on human health: How to (mis)interprete the clinical evidence', Redox Biology, vol. 34, 101532. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.redox.2020.101532

APA

Lykkesfeldt, J. (2020). On the effect of vitamin C intake on human health: How to (mis)interprete the clinical evidence. Redox Biology, 34, [101532]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.redox.2020.101532

Vancouver

Lykkesfeldt J. On the effect of vitamin C intake on human health: How to (mis)interprete the clinical evidence. Redox Biology. 2020;34. 101532. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.redox.2020.101532

Author

Lykkesfeldt, Jens. / On the effect of vitamin C intake on human health : How to (mis)interprete the clinical evidence. In: Redox Biology. 2020 ; Vol. 34.

Bibtex

@article{f84eb302f3674587b0a1cc3ecf70472e,
title = "On the effect of vitamin C intake on human health: How to (mis)interprete the clinical evidence",
abstract = "For decades, the potential beneficial effect of vitamin C on human health-beyond that of preventing scurvy-has been subject of much controversy. Hundreds of articles have appeared either in support of increased vitamin C intake through diet or supplements or rejecting the hypothesis that increased intake of vitamin C or supplementation may influence morbidity and mortality. The chemistry and pharmacology of vitamin C is complex and has unfortunately rarely been taken into account when designing clinical studies testing its effect on human health. However, ignoring its chemical lability, dose-dependent absorption and elimination kinetics, distribution via active transport, or complex dose-concentration-response relationships inevitably leads to poor study designs, inadequate inclusion and exclusion criteria and misinterpretation of results. The present review outlines the differences in vitamin C pharmacokinetics compared to normal low molecular weight drugs, focusses on potential pitfalls in study design and data interpretation, and re-examines major clinical studies of vitamin C in light of these.",
author = "Jens Lykkesfeldt",
note = "Copyright {\textcopyright} 2020 The Author. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.",
year = "2020",
doi = "10.1016/j.redox.2020.101532",
language = "English",
volume = "34",
journal = "Redox Biology",
issn = "2213-2317",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - On the effect of vitamin C intake on human health

T2 - How to (mis)interprete the clinical evidence

AU - Lykkesfeldt, Jens

N1 - Copyright © 2020 The Author. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

PY - 2020

Y1 - 2020

N2 - For decades, the potential beneficial effect of vitamin C on human health-beyond that of preventing scurvy-has been subject of much controversy. Hundreds of articles have appeared either in support of increased vitamin C intake through diet or supplements or rejecting the hypothesis that increased intake of vitamin C or supplementation may influence morbidity and mortality. The chemistry and pharmacology of vitamin C is complex and has unfortunately rarely been taken into account when designing clinical studies testing its effect on human health. However, ignoring its chemical lability, dose-dependent absorption and elimination kinetics, distribution via active transport, or complex dose-concentration-response relationships inevitably leads to poor study designs, inadequate inclusion and exclusion criteria and misinterpretation of results. The present review outlines the differences in vitamin C pharmacokinetics compared to normal low molecular weight drugs, focusses on potential pitfalls in study design and data interpretation, and re-examines major clinical studies of vitamin C in light of these.

AB - For decades, the potential beneficial effect of vitamin C on human health-beyond that of preventing scurvy-has been subject of much controversy. Hundreds of articles have appeared either in support of increased vitamin C intake through diet or supplements or rejecting the hypothesis that increased intake of vitamin C or supplementation may influence morbidity and mortality. The chemistry and pharmacology of vitamin C is complex and has unfortunately rarely been taken into account when designing clinical studies testing its effect on human health. However, ignoring its chemical lability, dose-dependent absorption and elimination kinetics, distribution via active transport, or complex dose-concentration-response relationships inevitably leads to poor study designs, inadequate inclusion and exclusion criteria and misinterpretation of results. The present review outlines the differences in vitamin C pharmacokinetics compared to normal low molecular weight drugs, focusses on potential pitfalls in study design and data interpretation, and re-examines major clinical studies of vitamin C in light of these.

U2 - 10.1016/j.redox.2020.101532

DO - 10.1016/j.redox.2020.101532

M3 - Review

C2 - 32535545

VL - 34

JO - Redox Biology

JF - Redox Biology

SN - 2213-2317

M1 - 101532

ER -

ID: 248555797