Is vitamin C supplementation beneficial? lessons learned from randomised controlled trials

Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Research › peer-review

Standard

Is vitamin C supplementation beneficial? lessons learned from randomised controlled trials. / Lykkesfeldt, Jens; Poulsen, Henrik Enghusen.

In: British Journal of Nutrition, Vol. 103, No. 9, 2010, p. 1251-1259.

Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Research › peer-review

Harvard

Lykkesfeldt, J & Poulsen, HE 2010, 'Is vitamin C supplementation beneficial? lessons learned from randomised controlled trials', British Journal of Nutrition, vol. 103, no. 9, pp. 1251-1259. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007114509993229

APA

Lykkesfeldt, J., & Poulsen, H. E. (2010). Is vitamin C supplementation beneficial? lessons learned from randomised controlled trials. British Journal of Nutrition, 103(9), 1251-1259. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007114509993229

Vancouver

Lykkesfeldt J, Poulsen HE. Is vitamin C supplementation beneficial? lessons learned from randomised controlled trials. British Journal of Nutrition. 2010;103(9):1251-1259. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007114509993229

Author

Lykkesfeldt, Jens ; Poulsen, Henrik Enghusen. / Is vitamin C supplementation beneficial? lessons learned from randomised controlled trials. In: British Journal of Nutrition. 2010 ; Vol. 103, No. 9. pp. 1251-1259.

Bibtex

@article{3d414460d12b11dea1f3000ea68e967b,
title = "Is vitamin C supplementation beneficial?: lessons learned from randomised controlled trials",
abstract = "In contrast to the promised {\textquoteleft}antioxidant miracle' of the 1980s, several randomised controlled trials have shown no effect of antioxidant supplements on hard endpoints such as morbidity and mortality. The former over-optimistic attitude has clearly called for a more realistic assessment of the benefit:harm ratio of antioxidant supplements. We have examined the literature on vitamin C intervention with the intention of drawing a conclusion on its possible beneficial or deleterious effect on health and the result is discouraging. One of several important issues is that vitamin C uptake is tightly controlled, resulting in a wide-ranging bioavailability depending on the current vitamin C status. Lack of proper selection criteria dominates the currently available literature. Thus, while supplementation with vitamin C is likely to be without effect for the majority of the Western population due to saturation through their normal diet, there could be a large subpopulation with a potential health problem that remains uninvestigated. The present review discusses the relevance of the available literature on vitamin C supplementation and proposes guidelines for future randomised intervention trials.",
author = "Jens Lykkesfeldt and Poulsen, {Henrik Enghusen}",
year = "2010",
doi = "10.1017/S0007114509993229",
language = "English",
volume = "103",
pages = "1251--1259",
journal = "British Journal of Nutrition",
issn = "0007-1145",
publisher = "Cambridge University Press",
number = "9",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Is vitamin C supplementation beneficial?

T2 - lessons learned from randomised controlled trials

AU - Lykkesfeldt, Jens

AU - Poulsen, Henrik Enghusen

PY - 2010

Y1 - 2010

N2 - In contrast to the promised ‘antioxidant miracle' of the 1980s, several randomised controlled trials have shown no effect of antioxidant supplements on hard endpoints such as morbidity and mortality. The former over-optimistic attitude has clearly called for a more realistic assessment of the benefit:harm ratio of antioxidant supplements. We have examined the literature on vitamin C intervention with the intention of drawing a conclusion on its possible beneficial or deleterious effect on health and the result is discouraging. One of several important issues is that vitamin C uptake is tightly controlled, resulting in a wide-ranging bioavailability depending on the current vitamin C status. Lack of proper selection criteria dominates the currently available literature. Thus, while supplementation with vitamin C is likely to be without effect for the majority of the Western population due to saturation through their normal diet, there could be a large subpopulation with a potential health problem that remains uninvestigated. The present review discusses the relevance of the available literature on vitamin C supplementation and proposes guidelines for future randomised intervention trials.

AB - In contrast to the promised ‘antioxidant miracle' of the 1980s, several randomised controlled trials have shown no effect of antioxidant supplements on hard endpoints such as morbidity and mortality. The former over-optimistic attitude has clearly called for a more realistic assessment of the benefit:harm ratio of antioxidant supplements. We have examined the literature on vitamin C intervention with the intention of drawing a conclusion on its possible beneficial or deleterious effect on health and the result is discouraging. One of several important issues is that vitamin C uptake is tightly controlled, resulting in a wide-ranging bioavailability depending on the current vitamin C status. Lack of proper selection criteria dominates the currently available literature. Thus, while supplementation with vitamin C is likely to be without effect for the majority of the Western population due to saturation through their normal diet, there could be a large subpopulation with a potential health problem that remains uninvestigated. The present review discusses the relevance of the available literature on vitamin C supplementation and proposes guidelines for future randomised intervention trials.

U2 - 10.1017/S0007114509993229

DO - 10.1017/S0007114509993229

M3 - Journal article

VL - 103

SP - 1251

EP - 1259

JO - British Journal of Nutrition

JF - British Journal of Nutrition

SN - 0007-1145

IS - 9

ER -

ID: 15815263